How much should the tax be on hazardous chemicals produced, used, or distributed in California?
What information would trigger a ban of a chemical by the state of California?
What incentives should the state of California provide to promote the development of safer chemical or product alternatives?
What would be the appropriate response by the state of California for failure to use safer alternatives?
What would be the appropriate response by the state of California for failure to disclose product ingredients?
By what date should the state of California require reusable or biodegradable non-petroleum based packaging?
How can industry use a multi-media standard, such as ISO 14000, to demonstrate they achieve performance above and beyond compliance with regulatory standards for product and processes?
What lines of scientific data (in vitro toxicity and other relevant properties) should the state of California consider and use for decision-making in the absence of traditional animal toxicity data?
What criteria should the State of California require as part of alternatives assessment by industry in determining which products are safer/greener?
How should the State of California use data (generated by others) in the chemical matrix for deciding which products are safe?
If third party life cycle analyses are required for specific products or materials, what State Agency, e.g. Department of Consumer Affairs, should be responsible for certifying or authorizing individuals to perform them?